Friday, December 21, 2012

Women, Prayer and Judaism ...

I find it fascinating that most Jews in the UK and US are either secular - ie they see themselves as belonging to a "tribe" rather than needing to practise the religion of Judaism - or quite liberal in terms of religion. Yet somehow the Orthodox and Haredi seem to manage to impose their will on the many, particularly in Israel.

The latest Israeli anti-women crack-down is over women wearing payer shawls at the Western Wall:

Arresting women praying at the Wall is not a matter of faith but of power and politics - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

Arrested at the Western Wall, British teenagers discover the limits of Jewish life in Israel - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

Given that so many Israelis are quite secular, that women are allowed in the army, that Golda Meir was one of the most famous prime ministers of Israel ... it's hard to believe that this is going on in 2012.

We've just finished celebrating Hanukkah (at least those of us not invalided out by Waitrose), which celebrates the liberation of Jerusalem from the Seleucid Antiochus IV by the Hasmoneans, and the re-dedication of the Temple (I know some people say it's just the miracle of the oil celebrated, but it's not). Judith may or may not be an apocryphal heroine who slew a Seleucid general, but Salome Alexandra was a well attested Hasmonean monarch, ruling in her own right rather than merely as a consort.

I was invited to a Hassidic synagogue over High Holidays (aka 'shul' if you're from a Yiddish-speaking background), and they could not have been kinder or more welcoming. I had to sit with the other women in a section screened off from the men. Did it upset me? No, because my feeling was that it was their house, so their rules applied, and I had chosen to go there rather than elsewhere.

But the Western or Wailing Wall, one of the few remains of Herod's Temple, is public property, belonging to all Jews, and should not be governed by the whims of the increasingly fanatical Haredi.

My understanding is that although women were exempt from many time-bound laws, this did not mean that they were forbidden from performing them, and this was the ruling of many great Medieval scholars.

I've been looking at Judaism in the Greek and Roman period outside of Israel, and the evidence for women is hardly sparse - the construction of many synagogues were funded by women, for example. The percentage of the population that were Jewish in the Roman Empire is hard to calculate with any certainty, but many estimates for the east Mediterranean go as high as 20% (I'm dubious of one claim putting it at 40%). There were "religious" Jews, but many of those living under the Romans and Byzantines were also religiously liberal - see, for example, the many synagogues decorated with images, despite the Mosaic proscription of these.

There were also a lot of Jews living in the Persian Empire, and these seem to have been more conservative, although there is a great bias in those sources in that they were entirely written by rabbinical scholars, and at most 10% of Jews followed rabbinical Judaism at the time (plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose ...). Eventually the Babylonian Talmud, compiled by those rabbis living in the Persian lands, became more important to Medieval scholars than the Jerusalem Talmud. Sephardi Jews continued to be allowed multiple wives long after the practise had been banned for Ashkenazi Jews (circa AD 1000, at a synod organised by Rabbeinu Gershom).

In the West, as early as the Medieval period some Sephardi and Ashkenazi women were allowed to learn the Torah, perform time-bound prayers, and wear Tefillin, and so forth. In the East Mediterranean and North Africa, women could not only attend synagogues but they could fund them - oh, and rule a kingdom. Before that we have Deborah, who was not only a Judge, but led an army into battle.

Women were always more than just baby-makers in Jewish society. Whilst it's lovely for the Hassidim that they breed like rabbits and are increasing in number ... I strongly object to the way that they are trying to impose their anachronistic, shtetlnik theories (most of which go back no further than the 18th century) on Judaism as a whole - and I object even more strongly to the fact that the State f Israel is allowing them to do so.

If women can fight for the soil of Israel, as they have done since Deborah, and continue to do today, they should be able to pray in any way they wish.


Further reading:

This is a fascinating article by Dr. Rachel Adelman well worth reading about women, Judaism, and her heroines.

Very much worth reading is: Avraham Grossman, Pious and Rebellious - Jewish Women in Medieval Europe, Brandeis 2004 - with a good review picking up many of the points about women, learning and prayer in this review.

3 comments:

theologyarchaeology said...

"(at least those of use not invalided out by Waitrose)" I think you need to correct that sentence. 'use' does not equal 'us' and not sure what you meant by the word 'invalided' is that a british nuance I am not familiar with?

maybe you should hire me as your proofreader-ha ha

You have an interesting perspective but one I cannot agree with. Not everything that happens to women is anti-woman. It seems that you do not want limitations or restrictions even when God ordered them.

Dorothy King said...

Thank you - I have corrected the typo. Oh, let's admit that I have terrible spelling - I was diagnosed with dyslexia in school, and whilst spell check is amazing, it's not *that* amazing. I am always happy to have them pointed out.

I am sure we can politely disagree on who ordered the restrictions - and I'm not sure that I personally would want to do "everything" ... frankly I'd rather not be in the army, but it seems rather odd that a country that expects women to fight and die for it like men, should also give women the right to pray as they wish?

I'm all for freedom of religion - that's why each religion has so many different types of houses of worship - but there is a huge difference, in my opinion, between giving people the choice to join that church / synagogue / mosque, and trying to impose those views on a whole country?

theologyarchaeology said...

I am not worried about your spelling ability, I make a lot myself. What i have found out about spell check is that it misses a lot of mistakes.

I see your point BUT there are different rules governing the church than govern a country.

I would agree with your last point but Israel is different from any other country in the world

Post a Comment