Sunday, February 27, 2011

Porphyry and ... Diocletian's Tomb?

A stone from Roman emperor Diocletian´s tomb found - Croatian Times Online News

Diocletian died in retirement at his palace at Split in modern Croatia, and that's where archaeologists have just found what they believe to be part of his porphyry tomb - presumably they mean part of his sarcophagus, and are basing this on its shape.

This deep purply-red stone comes only from Egypt, and became very popular for Imperial burials under Constantine, but not so much before the empire became Christian. It was used for sculptures through the Imperial period, notably the set of Tetrarchs in Venice.

This famous porphyry group of the Tetrarchs has been built into San Marco in Venice since 1231 and before it was taken after the Fourth Crusade it stood in the Bodrum Camii in Istanbul - the Venetians left behind a heel, see photo, which was found there and is now in the Archaeological Museum in Istanbul. The original location of the Tetrarchs is uncertain, but archaeologists believe that each pair of figures was inserted half way up a large column.


Later children of Byzantine emperors born whilst their father was on the throne were said to be born in the purple (Porphyrogenitos) because empresses gave birth in Constantinople in a room line in porphyry. The room is described by Anna Comnena, who was herself born in it in 1083 [Alexiad 7,2]:
... Nicephorus and Leo, the two sons of the Emperor Diogenes, who were born to him in the purple room after his elevation to the throne and were consequently styled " Porphyrogeniti." This purple room was a certain building in the palace shaped as a complete square from its base to the spring of the roof, which ended in a pyramid; it looked out upon the sea and the harbour where the stone oxen and lions stand. The floor of this room was paved with marbles and the walls were panelled with it but not with ordinary sorts nor even with the more expensive sorts which are fairly easy to procure, but with the marble which the earlier Emperors had carried away from Rome. And this marble is, roughly speaking, purple all over except for spots like white sand sprinkled over it. It is from this marble, I imagine, that our ancestors called the room " purple."

In Porphyrius' Passion of the Four Crowned Saints he describes Diocletian ('dilectatus in artem') hiring special carvers to sculpt capitals ('ex metallo porfiritico') out of porphyry ('ex monte porphyritico ... qui dicitue igneus') for him.

Diocletian - described as "infinitam quandam cupiditatem aedificandi" - built a fabulous palace at Split, the structure most associated with him today. Given the sources note his love of the purple stone, he can be seen as the genesis of it's extensive use by the emperors that succeeded him ... but it also means that unless we know more about the fragment found there, we can't assume it's a sarcophagus just based on the material.

Egypt fell to the Islamic armies of Mohammed's successors in AD 639, and the porphyry mines became inacessible to the Byzantines. Older sculptures continued to be re-cut and porphyry used as a material for small statues and heads but by then it had faded from fashion for Imperial inhumations - a number of Byzantine sources such as De Ceremoniis Aulæ Byzantinæ 2, 42 list where various emperors were buried, and the material their sarcophagi were made of, so we know the last porphyry sarcophagus used was for the joint burial of Marcian (died 457) and his wife Pulcheria (died 453) in the Church if the Holy Apostles in Constantinople.



The tombs of these early emperors, including Constantine, were looted by Alexius III Angelus circa 1200 to raise funds to bribe Henry VI Hohenstaufen not to invade. Constantinople was still sacked and looted as a result of the Fourth Crusade in 1204. The church itself was destroyed soon after the Ottoman conquest of 1453, to make way for a mosque of Mohammed the Conqueror - but not before the sarcophagi had been once again ransacked by men looking for loot but finding only old bones. The sarcophagi were scattered, many ending up in the Harem at the Topkapi, and are now in the ground of the archaeological museum. Although the De Ceremoniis Aulæ Byzantinæ described nine imperial porpyry sarcophagi in Constantinople these were not as elaborately decorated as those in Rome, so are now harder to identify - the easiest is the one described as cylindrical, as which belonged to Julian the Apostate (on the right in the photo above). The sarcophagus of Constantine the Great is described in sources as much bigger than the others, and so probably can be identified in the fragmentary sarcophagus decorated with Erotes gathering grapes (photo below).



Although no emperors are known to have used porphyry sarcophagi before Constantine, the so-called sarcophagus of Helena in the Vatican is decorated which scenes of was which suggest that it was that of her along with her husband Costantius I Chlorus. He was a contemporary of Diocletian, suggesting the practise could have gone back one generation.

I think I took these photos in May 2007, and because the sarcophagi are not labelled people tend to just walk past them - click on the photos to super-size them.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Libyan Archaeology Scandals

Just to pre-empt, since there will probably be press stories and blog posts about Libya and the miss-management of the country's archaeological heritage sooner or later. And just as with Egypt and Tunisia, coverage will eventually focus on various abuses of archaeological sites under Colonel Gaddaffi ... So yes, it's been bad there, and far worse than anything Ben Ali's in-laws did in Tunisia.

I know one archaeologist who was rather shocked to find a rare set of statues of Roman deities he'd excavated from a temple not in the local museum, where he had left them, but being offered for sale in London. Was this illegal looting? Well, no, since they were taken out of Libya and shipped off to be sold with Gaddafi's full permission. And since the Colonel's word was law, so was this transaction.

Before the raprochement with the US and UK, Libya needed hard currency and selling antiquities which they had in abundance served this purpose. They were traded as goods, commodities, and brought good priced. So finer busts on the market of Septimius Severus and his family tended to originate from Lepcis Magna his ancestral home.

Exporting antiquities was for a long tie a cash cow bringing in much needed hard currencies.

For now though we must concentrate our prayers on the many that have given their lives in this revolution, and those in Tunisia and Egypt. And place our hopes that out of these revolutions will be created a fairer and better Democratic society which finds space at the table for those of all points of view.

Friday, February 18, 2011

The Trabelsi Family and Antiquities

Two articles in the Tunisian press about the relatives of Ben Ali's wife, the Trabelsi family, and antiquities.

La Presse de Tunisie - plus-de-130-pieces-retrouvees | 22703 | 16022011

More than 130 pieces of archaeological material have been reclaimed from Trabelsi family villas, including the Punic stele in the photo here. According to Ezzeddine Bach Chaouch, the Mininster of Culture:
Certaines de ces pièces ... avaient servi comme ornements de chapiteaux, colonnes et bords de piscines dans des demeures luxueuses sises à Soukra, Sidi Bou Saïd et Hammamet.
 And this photo from the pool area of Ben Ali's daughter, Sakhr El Matri's villa pretty much makes the point ... archaeological material as garden furniture.

The second article cover antiquities smuggling and sounds pretty bad - I was under the impression that most of the North African material coming onto the art market had been exiting via Libya, but it sounds as if an awful lot was exiting via Tunisia.

La Presse de Tunisie - apres-la-guerre-des-clans-le-monopole | 22628 | 14022011:

"les innombrables objets archeologiques qui ont ete derobes et rassembles dans des maisons appartenant a l’ancienne famille regnante. Le trafic des pieces archeologiques est devenu, en effet, une activite fructueuse au profit des membres de la famille Trabelsi…"

A pretty damning article about the Trabelsi family of Ben Ali's wife and antiquities smuggling in Tunisia.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Cairo Museum Thefts

Zahi Hawass has just admitted that his previous claims that nothing was stolen from the Egyptian Museum were ... optimistic - or bull, depending on where one stands on his pro-Mubarak politics. The timing of the admission, soon after the departure of President Mubarak, a man Dr Hawass took to defending on various international news programmes, is also suspicious ... I'll keep updating this post as more information comes in, and it wouldn't surprise me if another list of missing pieces were released soon.

Sad News | drhawass.com - Zahi Hawass


1. Gilded wood statue of Tutankhamun being carried by a goddess (Photo: Griffith Institute)



2. Gilded wood statue of Tutankhamun harpooning. Only the torso and upper limbs of the king are missing (Photo: Griffith Institute)

3. Limestone statue of Akhenaten holding an offering table (first photo at top of post, in colour)

4. Statue of Nefertiti making offerings (I could only find this relief that matched the iconography in the description, not a statue ...)






5. Sandstone head of an Amarna princess (I found this description a little general, but in Egyptologist for Egypt on Facebook they've posted the photo above, although there were several on display so we're not sure which one is missing)

6. Stone statuette of a scribe from Amarna (In Egyptologist for Egypt on Facebook they've identified the piece as in the photo above)


7. Wooden shabti statuettes from Yuya (11 pieces - I've added a photo of one Shabti figure above, and the group display from the museum: all but one of the ones found in his tomb were "text from Chapter Six of TheShabtis.jpg (34479 bytes) Book of the Dead" - photos from here )



8. Heart Scarab of Yuya (shown below - it's described here, the source of the photo, as "a blue-glass/green feldspar heart scarab, originally carved for a man and subsequently reinscribed for Tuyu (CG 51164)")



Photos of some items are available on his blog, and I've included them in this post, and will keep updating it as items are identified. Better colour photos of some of the images have been added to Margaret Maitland's blog here.

In addition the store house at the Royal Necropolis at Dahshur was broken into, he admits. Update - I was expressing cynicism on Facebook at the De Morgan magazine was looted last night, as Hawass claims, and lo and behold ... someone posted a comment here on the 8th February about it having been looted http://egyptopaedia.com/2011/pyramid-fields/dashur#comment-101

Severan sculptures Found in Rome

AFP: Third-century Roman sculptures discovered

Two points make this news interesting:
1) the sculptures were deliberately buried - with bits of tufa between them - rather than thrown into the fountain by iconoclast vandals
2) the excavation was privately sponsored

The sculptures date from the last, third century phase of the villa, and many depict Septimius Severus and his family; there is also a statue of a nude Zeus and a herm. And since a pictures in worth a thousand words, here are photos of the sculptures themselves, which are particularly fine and suggest that the villa belonged to someone highly placed in society, probably with strong links to the Imperial family.



There is more about the find and a great photo of the sculptures in situ on Discovery News here.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

The Egyptian Museum etc

So, the latest news is that the Egyptian Museum in Cairo continues to be the front line of fighting between the pro Mubarak 'protestors' / hired mob (depending on whom you believe) and the anti Mubarak protesters - the army is no longer in charge of the Museum really, and more or less staying out of things in theory. Yesterday evening Cairo time the pro Mubarak thugs were throwing Molotov Cocktails, also known as petrol bombs, at the Museum or in it's general direction. The army managed to put these out - several fell into the garden of the Museum, although there is some dispute over whether or not one fell on the building itself - and used water cannons against the mob to try to drive them back.

The Museum's main problem is it's prime location - next to the ruling party's headquarters, on Tahrir Square where the protests are taking place.


View Larger Map

As I write the Museum is again on the front line - the line up seems to be Museum, then barricades, then army, then pro Mubarak mob throwing stones at them (by stones I mean they are tearing up slabs of paving or anything they can find, breaking them up into throwable chunks and ...). 

Nouraddin Adbulsamad last night blamed the Mubarak regime for deliberately sending thugs to target the Museum and called on Mubarak to resign.

Zahi Hawass initially spoke of the damage caused to various museums and sites in Egypt, but since his promotion to the Cabinet has started to deny all but minor damage in Cairo and Qantara - this must be the official Party Line as there is no other way it makes sense.

Despite his claims, reports coming in from both Egyptian and foreign archaeologists working in Egypt confirm that there was substantial looting in Saqqara and at Memphis.

The photo appeared in a few places and apparently shows locals illegally digging at Abousir.

There is some confusion over 'sealed' tombs that were raided or not. These are excavated tombs that were then used as store-rooms for other archaeological material, and 'sealed' with a padlock - Hawass claims the padlocks were broken off and nothing more, other archaeologists are talking about items being removed and in some cases of murals being hacked away. Again, this is very difficult to confirm.

This morning reports are again trickling in of attempts to loot sites during the night - thankfully of attempts that were foiled by locals.

A few points I find interesting:

a) the Director of the Royal Jewellery Museum hid it's contents, so clearly must have had some clue that something was going wrong to make him take this kind of pre-emptive action

b) the looting mostly seems to be of the vandalism / destruction rather than the stealing to re-sell kind. A number of museums' staff have said that the looters repeatedly asked where the gold objects were. This suggests to me that the looters are at least partially aware of how difficult it would be to sell antiquities, and so are looking for items whose material is valuable in itself.

This is one of the two mummies in Cairo that Hawass initially said had been decapitated by the robbers. He is now saying that the heads had long been separated from the bodies, and that these heads were in the lab being tested rather than in a display case.

This sounds very odd, because firstly it would suggest that the robbers had managed to get into far more parts of the museum than previously thought. The bones also look broken in the background of the photo, and this detail of the neck to me suggests a recent break.

Nobody is sure whose mummy this was - to me it looks Late Period, but Egyptology is not my field and this isn't really the sort of time to try bluffing my way in mummification techniques.

One damaged mummy was originally thought to be linked to this cartonage of Tjuya, which led to the assumption that she and her husband Tuya had been damaged. This is because the casing used to be displayed still attached to the body, but Aidan Dodson has pointed out that they were separated some time ago ...  So we're back to square one of having no idea who the damaged mummy is.



A few minutes ago Zahi Hawass released this photo on his web site (here) of a mummy head. It's not the same one as in the AP photo above, and is presumably the second head he's been talking about.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Egyptian Museum in Cairo is a Battle Ground

I was very kindly asked to talk about the looting of the Museum and archaeological sites on the news, and had hoped that I would be summarising and trying clarify the events of the last few days. That the looting and damage was over. Unfortunately the chaos at the Egyptian Museum is far from over, and the Museum is no longer safe.

Yesterday the army was using the ground to triage 'troublemakers' (mostly journalists working for Al Jazeera). Today they seem to have funnelled some of the crowds of pro Mubarak protesters that have suddenly appeared towards the Museum. By early lunchtime London time I tweeted along the lines that it was looking like another battle spot, and by the time I'd finished lunch ... The anti Mubarak protesters were in charge of the grounds and in possession of four tanks the army had left behind in the grounds.

Now, towards late afternoon London time, the army and various factions seem to be battling it out. Protesters - I'm not sure anyone is quite sure which side they are on - are throwing Molotov cocktails and firebombs at the Museum (or in it's direction) and the army is using water cannons to stop them, and secure the safety of the Museum. The army is also sing tear gas on crowds.

Dr Zahi Hawass is not, according to my sources, at the Museum. Despite his statement yesterday that very few archaeological sites had been vandalised, reports are coming in from around the country that they have been.

I will try to do a proper non-Blackberry round-up post clarifying the damaged and correcting earlier mistakes (the damaged mummies were not Yuya and Tjuya) but I'd also like to mention the amazing work of Prof Mustafa Waziri of Luxor who many Egyptologists on the ground are crediting with work above and beyond the call of duty in terms of safeguarding the Valley of the Kings.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Photo of Damaged Mummy & Updates

There is a link below to an AP high res photo of one of the damaged mummies. I don't know much about mummies, but it looks later than 19th Dynasty to me and must have been unwrapped some time ago based on the loose bones (one or two of which seem broken in the background). People seem to now think it's not Tut's great-grandparents - and that their gilt casings were damaged separately.
Reports are still coming in about sites, but what I find interesting is that people trying to break into the Egyptian Museum in Cairo were arrested Saturday and Sunday and Monday - this suggests to me that it is more than just looting to steal, but that there are waves of attempts to vandalise antiquities as part of protests against Mubarak's government because of their use of them as propaganda. Coptic churches have been targets in recent years, and this trend has continued with the Coptic Museum and Christian sites and monasteries being hit by looters in the last week. At least one major Muslim monument was also vandalised, and although some people outside Egypt are talking about Islamist factions protesting, actually most of the demonstrations seem to be largely secular.

Yesterday the Cairo Egyptian Musem had snipers installed on the roof, although since the army said they would not fire, I'm not sure what good they will do. Today the grounds of the Museum were being used by the army to filter out and interview potential trouble makers on their way to Freedom Square (mostly Al Jazeera journalists, it seems).

http://www.apimages.com/OneUp.aspx?st=k&kw=egypt&showact=results&sort=date&intv=36h&sh=10&kwstyle=or&adte=1296514428&pagez=60&cfasstyle=AND&rids=2de6eea4f06e4d0c8ee66ad72a0acbe4&dbm=PThirtyDay&page=1&xslt=1

(Apologies for the inelegant update but I still cannot type much on the Blackberry!)